Man As Man (A Treatise)

A motion of advance, in the emancipation of undiagnosed thought, has for centuries, fluctuated the gravity of dogma and superstition; in many such discrepancies of the single individual, through those testing times of autonomy there has been, a significant advent in the nature of intellect and philosophy, unencumbered by centuries of primitive, and retrogressive bigotry. Taking for example, the morbid and autodidactic necessity, which augmented the launch of Vesalius, in the study of the human fabric; his procurement of deceased vessels from the Parisian Montfaucon, or the gallows of the Belgian Louvain, something that would be worthy of indiscriminate grimace, if it not be for the designs accomplished, and the traditions negated in that militant devotion of human progression. I only mention this, in the order of my prefix, to merely encapsule the genius, which under unfortunate circumstance of intellectual liberty, must sacrifice the common integrity, if need be, for the ultimate jurisdiction of reason. The abundant notions of the human characters, cannot be bound idle, to the familiar illustrations of equiped knowledge, for the portrayal of curricular education, has not informed that multifaceted conclusion of the universal ethic, in its supervision. From this point, my understanding is that humans, as in respectable designations of the religious vein, and psychological attribute, have marginable superiority, over the foundation of exercised agency and hitherto, the solidity of individualism in the strain of thought. The course of our devotion, has its staple government within the institutions of a singular proverb of inclination, and in the collective premise of our abstractions and fallibility, exists, the sensitive molecule of purpose and desire. This is the first precinct of the conditional human, who in personal esteem is tested, by fractures of incidents and haranguing mysteries, which cannot be surmounted or perhaps understood without the primary recognition of the 'human' without religious adherence, education and conventional precept. What then is this human, and why has he been secluded, despite the exhilerating Hippocratic affirmations of the natural logic, without administration of demonological constructs and superstitions, or the Aristotelianism of human liberation under personal advice and curiosity in the understanding of the earthly composition; why is this physical being of private constitution, subjective divination and perpetuate decree of decision, frequently forgotten in the affairs of dogmatic ruling and cultural manifestations of precept. The psychological debate of the nature of the human, and his nurture each having conditional effect, must not be given strict dichotomy, and the necessity of social conformity must not be given predominant uniformity, for it is the justice of nature that the individual is understood, existentially and primarily as him/herself. The disease of adhering oblivion, comes with the contaminants of bigotry and exclusion, and ultimately leads to hypocrisy and arrogant standards of Puritan principles. It is thus important, that humans alone, are perceived in the interminable state of their idiosyncracy, and not, by the legislation they advocate or the championship of education and religious theology, for there is not, in these denominations, a faculty that does not initiate the devotion of the initial being.