Penumbra: A treatise.

In the discretion, of sufficing autonomy, unto which the ulterior synthesis of the individual, subjectively ofcourse, is given that primeval characteristic, there also exists, beyond mere sensibility, the ambiguous dichotomies of morality. The dispensable sentiments, pertaining to the multiform novelties granted to us by the leisurely favors of chance, remain deplorable in volume, as compared to the vital instrument of precept and volitional compass. I have said, dispensable, not to disregard the pleasurable, or perhaps otiose transience of non-rudimentary experience, but rather to presently, designate the question, of dualism under the inclement reins of condition. The question is quite a bother I must say. If one is ridden of the digestible assortments of aesthetic, where the administered designs are discriminated by the subjectivity of preference, then is some tenor of moral decision, forever lost? If there is no predicament that confines the function of probability, then is the distinguishing, course of behavior fully realized? Can those who do good, yield to great evil, with relinquishing earnest, when under, the extensive infringement of suffering? When I witnessed a child, implore her father for some pecuniary favor, and waltz with a wide grin to a beggar, whom the town had shunned due to his burnt visage, and administer to his empty cup, I felt an unbridled awe; and when I saw an acquaintance of mine whom I aggrandized as a saint, brought to the common expatiation of human fallibility when caught in the act of infidelity, I pondered on this curse of condition. Perhaps in the end, the notion of these dualities have been misaligned with the hyperbolic idealism of good and evil as predominantly immiscible polarities, when at best, we are agents of feasible purport, molded in the inclemencies of this penumbra of moral inquisition.